Difference between revisions of "Lawrence of Arabia restoration"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== 2011 restoration == | == 2011 restoration == | ||
| − | [[Grover Crisp]] supervised the 2011 digital restoration, scanned at 8K resolution. It was released to theatres in 4K and to Blu-ray in 1080p. A 4K UHD Blu-ray release has yet to happen yet. | + | [[Grover Crisp]] supervised the 2011 digital restoration, scanned at 8K resolution. It took six months to capture around 325,000 frames. <ref>[https://www.thestar.com/entertainment/movies/2015/07/15/how-to-restore-a-movie-masterpiece.html How to restore a movie masterpiece]</ref> The result was released to theatres in 4K and to Blu-ray in 1080p. A 4K UHD Blu-ray release has yet to happen yet. |
<q> A longer shot from Lawrence that was also taken in the desert showed a series of fine concentric lines near the top of the frame in a pattern reminiscent of a fingerprint. These, Crisp explained, are cracks in the film emulsion caused by its melting in the desert heat and then healing over. The lines have always been there in the negative and result in an unusual rippling artifact when viewing the movie, but until now there hasn’t been a way to fix it. “We’ve never been able to see this kind of detail before—it’s always been kind of submerged,” he says. “But now, with this 8K scan, it’s more obvious.” Sony commissioned a third party to develop software to minimize or eliminate this distracting artifact for the restored version, which is due out on Blu-ray and in theaters later this year. <ref>[https://www.soundandvision.com/content/hollywood-4k-way-page-2#ZZH1beV4PYU4DZY4.99 Hollywood, The 4K Way Page 2]</ref> </q> | <q> A longer shot from Lawrence that was also taken in the desert showed a series of fine concentric lines near the top of the frame in a pattern reminiscent of a fingerprint. These, Crisp explained, are cracks in the film emulsion caused by its melting in the desert heat and then healing over. The lines have always been there in the negative and result in an unusual rippling artifact when viewing the movie, but until now there hasn’t been a way to fix it. “We’ve never been able to see this kind of detail before—it’s always been kind of submerged,” he says. “But now, with this 8K scan, it’s more obvious.” Sony commissioned a third party to develop software to minimize or eliminate this distracting artifact for the restored version, which is due out on Blu-ray and in theaters later this year. <ref>[https://www.soundandvision.com/content/hollywood-4k-way-page-2#ZZH1beV4PYU4DZY4.99 Hollywood, The 4K Way Page 2]</ref> </q> | ||
Revision as of 21:47, 29 September 2018
1988 restoration
Robert A. Harris supervised the 1988 photochemical restoration, which was released in 70mm to theatres in 1989.
2011 restoration
Grover Crisp supervised the 2011 digital restoration, scanned at 8K resolution. It took six months to capture around 325,000 frames. [1] The result was released to theatres in 4K and to Blu-ray in 1080p. A 4K UHD Blu-ray release has yet to happen yet.
A longer shot from Lawrence that was also taken in the desert showed a series of fine concentric lines near the top of the frame in a pattern reminiscent of a fingerprint. These, Crisp explained, are cracks in the film emulsion caused by its melting in the desert heat and then healing over. The lines have always been there in the negative and result in an unusual rippling artifact when viewing the movie, but until now there hasn’t been a way to fix it. “We’ve never been able to see this kind of detail before—it’s always been kind of submerged,” he says. “But now, with this 8K scan, it’s more obvious.” Sony commissioned a third party to develop software to minimize or eliminate this distracting artifact for the restored version, which is due out on Blu-ray and in theaters later this year. [2]
