Editing Timeline of the decline of Toronto movie theatres

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 145: Line 145:
 
** It seems in character that while filmmaker Christopher Nolan is trying to restore grandeur to the movie-going experience through advocacy of large-format IMAX experiences like Oppenheimer, that Cineplex makes headlines via undermining that grandeur with out of focus reels and halting the movie 40 minutes before it is over.
 
** It seems in character that while filmmaker Christopher Nolan is trying to restore grandeur to the movie-going experience through advocacy of large-format IMAX experiences like Oppenheimer, that Cineplex makes headlines via undermining that grandeur with out of focus reels and halting the movie 40 minutes before it is over.
 
* There's an online petition ([https://www.change.org/p/stop-cineplex-from-crushing-indie-theatres?utm_source=NICE Stop Cineplex From Crushing Indie Theatres!]) which alleges that "Cineplex has an informal and unlawful arrangement with film distributors that will not allow films to be booked with any competing theatres until Cineplex is done screening the film."  So even if another theatre chain wanted to build an IMAX theatre and give customers an opportunity to see Oppenheimer in focus and without shutting off with 40 minutes left to go, would Cineplex have informal arrangements with Universal preventing this from happening?  Where do Toronto movie goers go when one chain controls 100% of the IMAX Oppenheimer experience?
 
* There's an online petition ([https://www.change.org/p/stop-cineplex-from-crushing-indie-theatres?utm_source=NICE Stop Cineplex From Crushing Indie Theatres!]) which alleges that "Cineplex has an informal and unlawful arrangement with film distributors that will not allow films to be booked with any competing theatres until Cineplex is done screening the film."  So even if another theatre chain wanted to build an IMAX theatre and give customers an opportunity to see Oppenheimer in focus and without shutting off with 40 minutes left to go, would Cineplex have informal arrangements with Universal preventing this from happening?  Where do Toronto movie goers go when one chain controls 100% of the IMAX Oppenheimer experience?
* According to its [https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/cineplex-reports-second-quarter-2023-results-896833911.html Second Quarter 2023 Results], revenues are up at Cineplex. Net income is up at $176.5 million. Too bad the effort invested towards pleasing Cineplex shareholders isn't applied to give ticket buyers an equally pleasing experience.
+
* According to its [https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/cineplex-reports-second-quarter-2023-results-896833911.html Second Quarter 2023 Results], revenues are up at Cineplex. Net income is up at $176.5 million. Too bad the effort invested to please Cineplex shareholders isn't applied to give ticket buyers an equally pleasing experience.
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
  
 
<references />
 
<references />

Please note that all contributions to Chuckipedia may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Chuckipedia:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To edit this page, please answer the question that appears below (more info):

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)